My name is Gwen and I’m here to wasssshhh your vagine!

     So when I was in high school, that was the “joke” saying because it was the best comic act ever.  I had no idea who it was by, so I was stoked to reminisce on that aspect of my high school years.

    Margaret Cho’s stand up comic act really relates to many theorist we’ve read thus far in theory 330.  First, I would like to relate her to Smith, the poet that I saw at the English symposium.  Smith focused on stereotypes of the blacks.  As I stated in a previous blog, she focused on drive bys and shootings.  She said how its a stereotype that people relate violence in only black community’s; well Cho does a similar thing.  Cho focuses on the gay community, the KKK, relationships, and the Korean community’s.  In act 7, she went into depth speaking of the Asian consulting.  She went on to say how the Asian consultant said to her to use chopsticks, than add them to her hair, no shoes in the house, use this abacus, you have a “native” language, you can not marry a white man, your jobs tend to be lower class, and your eyes are smaller than white peoples.  So both Smith and Cho better explain stereotypes that our society will holds present.

     Cho also relates to Micheal Foucualt.  Foucualt writes about discourse, the way society makes meaning of actions.  Society does not want to talk about sex, we like to ignore it.  Not only do we like to ignore sex, but we also tend to drift away from homosexuality and anything aside from heterosexual.  Cho speaks of homosexuality many times.  Whether or not she actually did, she said that she had sex with a woman on a ship.  She also ties into account that her Mother leaves messages saying “only gays screen phone calls.”  So the connection here is how Cho is one out of thousands, even maybe millions, who take a stand and who actually speak out about sex…and especially homosexual issues.  What does this say for us?

     Last but not least, its very apparent that Cho relates to Butler.  Butler discusses gender roles and roles that are basically “assigned” to us.  Chos act 6-7 demonstrate how Korean women are suppose to look / act.  There two connections paint a picture of what society believe to be true.  Of course its funny to watch such a video clip, but we all must keep in mind that these are real problems that arise.  A stupid TV station is giving Cho a problem telling her that she needs to loose weight to play herself on a show…does that make any sense to anyone? 

     Society needs to take a step back at moments, and try to realize what it does to their people.  As society, we give such hard times to its members instead of focusing on what matters.  In act 9 she spoke of killing herself from all the pressures, is that seriously what we want?  Lets let individuals be individuals…and Cho speak for us all!

April 3, 2007. Uncategorized.

4 Comments

  1. estherspace replied:

    Hi Annie! I liked your post. I can just imagine an entire high school walking around saying, “My name is Gwen and I’m going to waaaaaaaassssshh your vagina.” So totally up the high school alley.

    While you claim that Foucault argues that society does not like to talk about sex, I was under the impression that Foucault felt that society didn’t try to ignore sex, but instead made it subversive and therefore, while it looked like it was being repressed, in actuality it was everyone and always being talked about in a variety of discourses.

    April 4, 2007 at 12:38 pm. Permalink.

  2. Carnival Three (Per) Forming Sexuality « Ménage Je To replied:

    [...] discussing Margaret Cho in relation to Judith Butler, John  and Annie’s blog acknowledge a blind spot in Butler’s “Gender Trouble.” John who is a unicorn states that [...]

    April 9, 2007 at 10:13 am. Permalink.

  3. bobsaget replied:

    I also enjoyed this quote. In my blog I focused on the chip n dale dancers and to an experience I had in high school. One question that I kept asking myself was “Is she gay?” It was odd how she talked about it so much and yet she never labeled herself straight or homosexual. Aother thing I found interesting was her choice of the word Fag. I know she thinks its just a tool of labeling but her choice of its use could easily be seen as offensive. I looked at it as if a white comedian started using the word nigger and as a defense just said “No its ok All my friends are black and they use it” Was this a war aagainst the tools of labeling or was it just a poor word choice?

    April 10, 2007 at 3:01 pm. Permalink.

  4. Cara replied:

    I to remember hearing this joke and I thought it was hilarious, but never really knew who it was by. When I found out it was by Cho, I was so happy to finally know!!I agree with you about the whole individual thing. It’s so hard nowadays to “fit in” because of all the social norm crap. I think that if everyone would just stop and think about it for a moment they’d realize that it’s just not worth it. In the end, we all end up in the same place, right? Who cares what you look like as long as you’re happy. I think that’s all that really matters.

    April 12, 2007 at 5:52 pm. Permalink.

Leave a Reply

Trackback URI